New ArrivalsBack in stock
tracking collar for dogs
4.7
（215件）
Limited Time Sale
Until the end
00
00
00
Free shipping on orders over 999 ※）
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
There is stock in your local store.
Please note that the sales price and tax displayed may differ between online and in-store. Also, the product may be out of stock in-store.
Coupon giveaway!
| Control number |
New ：D860271488 second hand ：D860271488 |
Manufacturer | tracking collar | release date | 2025-05-16 | List price | $39 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prototype | collar for | ||||||||
| category | |||||||||
Insurance Tech#Pet Risk Management
When it comes to ensuring the safety and well-being of our four-legged companions, pet owners are continually on the lookout for the latest and most effective technologies to keep their furry friends secure. One such technology that has gained significant traction in recent years is the tracking collar for dogs. These devices are designed to monitor a pet's location and movement, helping to prevent them from straying too far and potentially getting lost. Two main types of pet trackers have emerged in the market: collar-mounted and implantable. This article will delve into the pros and cons of each, analyzing their features, effectiveness, and suitability for different breeds and lifestyles.
Collar-Mounted Pet Trackers
Collar-mounted tracking collars for dogs are the most common type of pet tracking device and are worn externally around the pet's neck. These devices operate through GPS technology, cellular networks, or a combination of both, to pinpoint the exact location of the pet. They are typically battery-powered and require periodic charging or battery replacement.
Advantages of Collar-Mounted Trackers:
1. Ease of Use: Collar-mounted trackers are generally easy to use, as they simply clip onto the pet's collar. They are also straightforward to set up, with most devices offering user-friendly smartphone apps for real-time tracking and location updates.
2. Visibility: Since these trackers are worn on the outside, they can serve as a deterrent to potential thieves or those who might try to harm the pet. Visible trackers can discourage such individuals from approaching the dog in the first place.
3. Customizability: Many collar-mounted trackers come with customizable settings, allowing pet owners to set safe zones, receive alerts when their pet leaves a designated area, and track their pet's activity levels.
4. Versatility: These devices are suitable for a wide range of dog breeds and sizes, making them a popular choice for pet owners with different types of dogs.
Disadvantages of Collar-Mounted Trackers:
1. Durability: Collar-mounted trackers can be susceptible to damage from wear and tear, especially if the dog is particularly active or likes to swim. They may also be more easily removed or tampered with than implantable devices.
2. Battery Life: The battery life of collar-mounted trackers can vary, and some models may require daily charging, which can be inconvenient for pet owners.
3. Comfort: Some dogs may find collar-mounted trackers uncomfortable or restrictive, especially if they are not used to wearing collars or if the device is bulky.
Implantable Pet Trackers
Implantable pet trackers, also known as microchips, are small, rice-sized devices that are inserted under the skin of the pet, typically between the shoulder blades. These trackers use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to transmit a unique identification number that can be read by specialized scanners.
Advantages of Implantable Trackers:
1. Durability: Implantable trackers are more resistant to damage, as they are protected within the pet's body. They are also less likely to be lost or removed, providing a more permanent tracking solution.
2. Longevity: Unlike collar-mounted trackers, which require battery replacements or charging, implantable trackers have a longer lifespan, as they do not rely on batteries.
3. Undetectable: Implantable trackers are not visible to the naked eye, making them less likely to be targeted by thieves or individuals with malicious intent.
4. Universality: Microchips can be implanted in virtually any dog, regardless of breed or size, making them a suitable option for a wide range of pets.
Disadvantages of Implantable Trackers:
1. Surgical Procedure: Implanting a microchip requires a minor surgical procedure, which can be stressful for the pet and may pose a risk of infection or other complications.
2. Limited Functionality: Implantable trackers provide only basic identification information and cannot track the pet's location in real-time. They are more useful for reuniting a lost pet with its owner rather than monitoring its daily activities.
3. Registration and Updates: In order for an implantable tracker to be effective, the pet owner must register the microchip with a national database and keep their contact information up-to-date. Failure to do so can render the tracker useless in the event that the pet is lost.
4. Compatibility: Not all veterinary clinics and animal shelters have the equipment necessary to read microchips, which can make locating a lost pet more difficult.
Comparing Collar-Mounted vs. Implantable Pet Trackers
When comparing collar-mounted and implantable pet trackers, it is essential to consider the specific needs and lifestyle of the pet owner and their dog. Here are some key factors to consider:
1. Tracking Capabilities: If the primary concern is tracking the pet's location in real-time, a collar-mounted tracker is the better option. Implantable trackers are more useful for identification purposes and reuniting lost pets with their owners.
2. Durability and Longevity: Implantable trackers are more durable and have a longer lifespan than collar-mounted trackers, making
Update Time:2025-05-16 05:10:28
Collar-Mounted Pet Trackers
Collar-mounted tracking collars for dogs are the most common type of pet tracking device and are worn externally around the pet's neck. These devices operate through GPS technology, cellular networks, or a combination of both, to pinpoint the exact location of the pet. They are typically battery-powered and require periodic charging or battery replacement.
Advantages of Collar-Mounted Trackers:
1. Ease of Use: Collar-mounted trackers are generally easy to use, as they simply clip onto the pet's collar. They are also straightforward to set up, with most devices offering user-friendly smartphone apps for real-time tracking and location updates.
2. Visibility: Since these trackers are worn on the outside, they can serve as a deterrent to potential thieves or those who might try to harm the pet. Visible trackers can discourage such individuals from approaching the dog in the first place.
3. Customizability: Many collar-mounted trackers come with customizable settings, allowing pet owners to set safe zones, receive alerts when their pet leaves a designated area, and track their pet's activity levels.
4. Versatility: These devices are suitable for a wide range of dog breeds and sizes, making them a popular choice for pet owners with different types of dogs.
Disadvantages of Collar-Mounted Trackers:
1. Durability: Collar-mounted trackers can be susceptible to damage from wear and tear, especially if the dog is particularly active or likes to swim. They may also be more easily removed or tampered with than implantable devices.
2. Battery Life: The battery life of collar-mounted trackers can vary, and some models may require daily charging, which can be inconvenient for pet owners.
3. Comfort: Some dogs may find collar-mounted trackers uncomfortable or restrictive, especially if they are not used to wearing collars or if the device is bulky.
Implantable Pet Trackers
Implantable pet trackers, also known as microchips, are small, rice-sized devices that are inserted under the skin of the pet, typically between the shoulder blades. These trackers use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to transmit a unique identification number that can be read by specialized scanners.
Advantages of Implantable Trackers:
1. Durability: Implantable trackers are more resistant to damage, as they are protected within the pet's body. They are also less likely to be lost or removed, providing a more permanent tracking solution.
2. Longevity: Unlike collar-mounted trackers, which require battery replacements or charging, implantable trackers have a longer lifespan, as they do not rely on batteries.
3. Undetectable: Implantable trackers are not visible to the naked eye, making them less likely to be targeted by thieves or individuals with malicious intent.
4. Universality: Microchips can be implanted in virtually any dog, regardless of breed or size, making them a suitable option for a wide range of pets.
Disadvantages of Implantable Trackers:
1. Surgical Procedure: Implanting a microchip requires a minor surgical procedure, which can be stressful for the pet and may pose a risk of infection or other complications.
2. Limited Functionality: Implantable trackers provide only basic identification information and cannot track the pet's location in real-time. They are more useful for reuniting a lost pet with its owner rather than monitoring its daily activities.
3. Registration and Updates: In order for an implantable tracker to be effective, the pet owner must register the microchip with a national database and keep their contact information up-to-date. Failure to do so can render the tracker useless in the event that the pet is lost.
4. Compatibility: Not all veterinary clinics and animal shelters have the equipment necessary to read microchips, which can make locating a lost pet more difficult.
Comparing Collar-Mounted vs. Implantable Pet Trackers
When comparing collar-mounted and implantable pet trackers, it is essential to consider the specific needs and lifestyle of the pet owner and their dog. Here are some key factors to consider:
1. Tracking Capabilities: If the primary concern is tracking the pet's location in real-time, a collar-mounted tracker is the better option. Implantable trackers are more useful for identification purposes and reuniting lost pets with their owners.
2. Durability and Longevity: Implantable trackers are more durable and have a longer lifespan than collar-mounted trackers, making
Update Time:2025-05-16 05:10:28
Pet Risk Management Daily rankings
Correction of product information
If you notice any omissions or errors in the product information on this page, please use the correction request form below.
Correction Request Form
