New ArrivalsBack in stock
real time gps tracker for dogs
4.6
（415件）
Limited Time Sale
Until the end
00
00
00
Free shipping on orders over 999 ※）
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
There is stock in your local store.
Please note that the sales price and tax displayed may differ between online and in-store. Also, the product may be out of stock in-store.
Coupon giveaway!
| Control number |
New ：D341313622 second hand ：D341313622 |
Manufacturer | real time | release date | 2025-05-17 | List price | $42 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prototype | time gps | ||||||||
| category | |||||||||
Senior Care#Elderly Pet Monitoring
In the realm of pet technology, the quest for keeping our furry friends safe and accounted for has led to the development of innovative devices like real-time GPS trackers for dogs. These devices have revolutionized the way pet owners locate their pets, providing peace of mind and a sense of security. Two of the most common connectivity options for these trackers are Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Understanding the differences between these two technologies is crucial for pet owners to make an informed decision when choosing a real-time GPS tracker for their dogs.
Bluetooth is a wireless technology standard for exchanging data over short distances from fixed and mobile devices. It operates in the 2.4 GHz frequency band and is commonly used for creating personal area networks (PANs) with high levels of security. Bluetooth has several versions, with the most recent being Bluetooth 5.0, which offers faster data transfer speeds, longer range, and improved coexistence with other wireless technologies.
Wi-Fi, on the other hand, is a wireless networking technology that allows devices to connect to the internet or communicate with each other wirelessly within a local area network (LAN). It operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands and is primarily used for connecting devices to the internet or局域网. Wi-Fi has various standards, with the most recent being Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which offers increased capacity, improved performance, and enhanced power efficiency.
When it comes to real-time GPS trackers for dogs, both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi have their advantages and disadvantages.
1. Range:
Bluetooth has a shorter range compared to Wi-Fi, with a typical range of around 10 meters (33 feet) for Bluetooth 4.0 and up to 100 meters (330 feet) for Bluetooth 5.0 under ideal conditions. Wi-Fi, on the other hand, has a much longer range, with indoor ranges of up to 30 meters (100 feet) and outdoor ranges of up to 100 meters (330 feet) for Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) and even greater distances for Wi-Fi 6.
For real-time GPS trackers for dogs, this means that Bluetooth trackers will have a limited range, making them suitable for tracking pets within a relatively small area, such as a home or a backyard. Wi-Fi trackers, with their longer range, can be more effective for tracking pets over larger areas, such as a neighborhood or park.
2. Battery Life:
Bluetooth devices generally consume less power than Wi-Fi devices, which translates to longer battery life for Bluetooth-based real-time GPS trackers for dogs. Wi-Fi devices, due to their higher power consumption, will require more frequent charging or battery replacement, which may be a concern for pet owners who want a tracker with extended battery life.
3. Data Transfer Speeds:
Wi-Fi offers faster data transfer speeds than Bluetooth, which can be an advantage for real-time GPS trackers for dogs that require frequent updates and quick transmission of location data. Bluetooth 5.0, for example, has a maximum data transfer speed of 2 Mbps, while Wi-Fi 5 can reach speeds of up to 866 Mbps. This means that Wi-Fi-based trackers can provide more frequent and accurate updates on a dog's location, while Bluetooth trackers may have slower update rates.
4. Security:
Both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi offer security features to protect against unauthorized access and data theft. Bluetooth uses encryption and authentication protocols to secure data transmission, while Wi-Fi relies on security protocols such as WPA2 and WPA3. However, Wi-Fi networks are generally considered more vulnerable to hacking and unauthorized access due to their reliance on shared passwords and the potential for signal interference from other devices.
For real-time GPS trackers for dogs, this means that Bluetooth trackers may offer a higher level of security, as they are less likely to be intercepted or accessed by unauthorized individuals. Wi-Fi trackers, while still secure, may require additional measures to protect against potential vulnerabilities.
5. Cost:
Bluetooth devices are generally less expensive to produce than Wi-Fi devices, which can translate to lower costs for pet owners purchasing real-time GPS trackers for dogs. Wi-Fi trackers, due to their more advanced technology and faster data transfer speeds, may be more expensive than their Bluetooth counterparts.
6. Ease of Use:
Bluetooth devices are typically easier to set up and use than Wi-Fi devices, as they require less configuration and setup. Real-time GPS trackers for dogs that use Bluetooth can be quickly paired with a smartphone or tablet, making it simple for pet owners to track their pets' locations. Wi-Fi trackers may require more complex setup processes, such as connecting to a Wi-Fi network and configuring settings, which can be a drawback for pet owners who want a straightforward and easy-to-use tracking solution.
7. Interference:
Both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi can experience interference from other wireless devices operating in the same frequency bands. However, Wi-Fi is more susceptible to interference due to its reliance on a larger number of connected devices and its use of multiple frequency bands. This can result in reduced performance and accuracy for Wi-Fi-based real-time
Update Time:2025-05-17 02:53:22
Bluetooth is a wireless technology standard for exchanging data over short distances from fixed and mobile devices. It operates in the 2.4 GHz frequency band and is commonly used for creating personal area networks (PANs) with high levels of security. Bluetooth has several versions, with the most recent being Bluetooth 5.0, which offers faster data transfer speeds, longer range, and improved coexistence with other wireless technologies.
Wi-Fi, on the other hand, is a wireless networking technology that allows devices to connect to the internet or communicate with each other wirelessly within a local area network (LAN). It operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands and is primarily used for connecting devices to the internet or局域网. Wi-Fi has various standards, with the most recent being Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which offers increased capacity, improved performance, and enhanced power efficiency.
When it comes to real-time GPS trackers for dogs, both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi have their advantages and disadvantages.
1. Range:
Bluetooth has a shorter range compared to Wi-Fi, with a typical range of around 10 meters (33 feet) for Bluetooth 4.0 and up to 100 meters (330 feet) for Bluetooth 5.0 under ideal conditions. Wi-Fi, on the other hand, has a much longer range, with indoor ranges of up to 30 meters (100 feet) and outdoor ranges of up to 100 meters (330 feet) for Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) and even greater distances for Wi-Fi 6.
For real-time GPS trackers for dogs, this means that Bluetooth trackers will have a limited range, making them suitable for tracking pets within a relatively small area, such as a home or a backyard. Wi-Fi trackers, with their longer range, can be more effective for tracking pets over larger areas, such as a neighborhood or park.
2. Battery Life:
Bluetooth devices generally consume less power than Wi-Fi devices, which translates to longer battery life for Bluetooth-based real-time GPS trackers for dogs. Wi-Fi devices, due to their higher power consumption, will require more frequent charging or battery replacement, which may be a concern for pet owners who want a tracker with extended battery life.
3. Data Transfer Speeds:
Wi-Fi offers faster data transfer speeds than Bluetooth, which can be an advantage for real-time GPS trackers for dogs that require frequent updates and quick transmission of location data. Bluetooth 5.0, for example, has a maximum data transfer speed of 2 Mbps, while Wi-Fi 5 can reach speeds of up to 866 Mbps. This means that Wi-Fi-based trackers can provide more frequent and accurate updates on a dog's location, while Bluetooth trackers may have slower update rates.
4. Security:
Both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi offer security features to protect against unauthorized access and data theft. Bluetooth uses encryption and authentication protocols to secure data transmission, while Wi-Fi relies on security protocols such as WPA2 and WPA3. However, Wi-Fi networks are generally considered more vulnerable to hacking and unauthorized access due to their reliance on shared passwords and the potential for signal interference from other devices.
For real-time GPS trackers for dogs, this means that Bluetooth trackers may offer a higher level of security, as they are less likely to be intercepted or accessed by unauthorized individuals. Wi-Fi trackers, while still secure, may require additional measures to protect against potential vulnerabilities.
5. Cost:
Bluetooth devices are generally less expensive to produce than Wi-Fi devices, which can translate to lower costs for pet owners purchasing real-time GPS trackers for dogs. Wi-Fi trackers, due to their more advanced technology and faster data transfer speeds, may be more expensive than their Bluetooth counterparts.
6. Ease of Use:
Bluetooth devices are typically easier to set up and use than Wi-Fi devices, as they require less configuration and setup. Real-time GPS trackers for dogs that use Bluetooth can be quickly paired with a smartphone or tablet, making it simple for pet owners to track their pets' locations. Wi-Fi trackers may require more complex setup processes, such as connecting to a Wi-Fi network and configuring settings, which can be a drawback for pet owners who want a straightforward and easy-to-use tracking solution.
7. Interference:
Both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi can experience interference from other wireless devices operating in the same frequency bands. However, Wi-Fi is more susceptible to interference due to its reliance on a larger number of connected devices and its use of multiple frequency bands. This can result in reduced performance and accuracy for Wi-Fi-based real-time
Update Time:2025-05-17 02:53:22
Elderly Pet Monitoring Daily rankings
Correction of product information
If you notice any omissions or errors in the product information on this page, please use the correction request form below.
Correction Request Form
