New ArrivalsBack in stock
pet tracker
4.2
（312件）
Limited Time Sale
Until the end
00
00
00
Free shipping on orders over 999 ※）
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
If you buy it for 999 or more, you can buy it on behalf of the customer. There is no material for the number of hands.
There is stock in your local store.
Please note that the sales price and tax displayed may differ between online and in-store. Also, the product may be out of stock in-store.
Coupon giveaway!
| Control number |
New ：D392060896 second hand ：D392060896 |
Manufacturer | pet tracker | release date | 2025-05-16 | List price | $45 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prototype | pet tracker | ||||||||
| category | |||||||||
Pet Smart Hardware#Wearable Devices
Pet tracking technology has evolved significantly over the years, with pet owners now having multiple options to monitor their beloved companions' whereabouts. Two of the most popular pet tracker options available today are collar-mounted trackers and implantable trackers. Both of these technologies have their advantages and disadvantages, and understanding the differences between them can help pet owners make an informed decision on which one is best for their pet's needs.
Collar-Mounted Pet Trackers
Collar-mounted pet trackers are external devices that attach to a pet's collar, allowing the owner to track their pet's location using GPS technology. These trackers are designed to be user-friendly and easy to install, making them a popular choice for pet owners who want a straightforward and accessible solution for monitoring their pet's movements.
Advantages:
1. Ease of use: Collar-mounted pet trackers are straightforward to set up and use. Most models come with a user-friendly app that allows pet owners to easily track their pet's location in real-time. This makes it simple for owners to keep tabs on their pet's movements and ensure their safety.
2. Visible deterrent: The presence of a collar-mounted pet tracker can act as a visible deterrent to potential thieves or those who may try to harm the pet. This can provide an added layer of security for pet owners who are concerned about their pet's safety.
3. Customization: Many collar-mounted pet trackers offer customizable settings, allowing pet owners to set up virtual fences and receive notifications if their pet leaves a designated area. This can be particularly useful for pet owners who want to monitor their pet's movements within a specific area, such as a backyard or neighborhood.
4. Battery life: Collar-mounted pet trackers typically have a longer battery life compared to implantable trackers. This means that pet owners won't need to worry about replacing the battery as frequently, making the device more convenient to use in the long run.
Disadvantages:
1. Reliability: Collar-mounted pet trackers rely on GPS technology, which can sometimes be inaccurate or unreliable, especially in urban areas with tall buildings or dense foliage. This can make it difficult for pet owners to pinpoint their pet's exact location in some situations.
2. Visibility: Since collar-mounted trackers are external devices, they can be easily spotted by others, including potential thieves who may target pets with these devices. This can put the pet at risk of being stolen or harmed.
3. Comfort: Some pets may find collar-mounted trackers uncomfortable or irritating, especially if the device is large or heavy. This can lead to the pet trying to remove the collar or tracker, potentially compromising the device's effectiveness.
4. Durability: Collar-mounted pet trackers can be prone to damage from wear and tear, weather, or accidents. This can reduce the device's effectiveness and may require pet owners to replace the tracker more frequently.
Implantable Pet Trackers
Implantable pet trackers, also known as microchips, are small devices that are inserted under the pet's skin by a veterinarian. These trackers use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to store a unique identification number that can be scanned by a compatible reader to retrieve the pet's information.
Advantages:
1. Durability: Implantable pet trackers are designed to last a lifetime, making them a more permanent solution for pet owners who want to ensure their pet's safety and security. These trackers are less likely to be damaged or lost compared to collar-mounted devices.
2. Undetectable: Since implantable trackers are inserted under the pet's skin, they are not visible to others, reducing the risk of theft or targeting by potential thieves.
3. Comfort: Implantable pet trackers are small and lightweight, making them comfortable for pets to wear. Pets are unlikely to notice the presence of the device, reducing the risk of irritation or discomfort.
4. Universal compatibility: Implantable pet trackers are compatible with a wide range of scanners, making it easier for shelters, veterinarians, and pet owners to access the pet's information if needed.
Disadvantages:
1. Invasive procedure: Implantable pet trackers require a minor surgical procedure to insert the device under the pet's skin. This can be a concern for pet owners who are hesitant to put their pet through an invasive procedure.
2. Limited tracking capabilities: Implantable pet trackers do not offer real-time tracking capabilities like collar-mounted devices. Instead, they provide a unique identification number that can be used to locate the pet's owner if the pet is found by someone else. This makes them less useful for pet owners who want to monitor their pet's movements in real-time.
3. Cost: Implantable pet trackers can be more expensive than collar-mounted devices, both in terms of the initial cost of the tracker and the cost of the veterinary procedure required to insert the device.
4. Battery life: While implantable trackers do not require battery replacements, they rely on a power source from the pet's body to function. Over time, this can cause the device to lose power and become less effective.
Conclusion
Both collar-mounted and implantable
Update Time:2025-05-16 00:28:13
Collar-Mounted Pet Trackers
Collar-mounted pet trackers are external devices that attach to a pet's collar, allowing the owner to track their pet's location using GPS technology. These trackers are designed to be user-friendly and easy to install, making them a popular choice for pet owners who want a straightforward and accessible solution for monitoring their pet's movements.
Advantages:
1. Ease of use: Collar-mounted pet trackers are straightforward to set up and use. Most models come with a user-friendly app that allows pet owners to easily track their pet's location in real-time. This makes it simple for owners to keep tabs on their pet's movements and ensure their safety.
2. Visible deterrent: The presence of a collar-mounted pet tracker can act as a visible deterrent to potential thieves or those who may try to harm the pet. This can provide an added layer of security for pet owners who are concerned about their pet's safety.
3. Customization: Many collar-mounted pet trackers offer customizable settings, allowing pet owners to set up virtual fences and receive notifications if their pet leaves a designated area. This can be particularly useful for pet owners who want to monitor their pet's movements within a specific area, such as a backyard or neighborhood.
4. Battery life: Collar-mounted pet trackers typically have a longer battery life compared to implantable trackers. This means that pet owners won't need to worry about replacing the battery as frequently, making the device more convenient to use in the long run.
Disadvantages:
1. Reliability: Collar-mounted pet trackers rely on GPS technology, which can sometimes be inaccurate or unreliable, especially in urban areas with tall buildings or dense foliage. This can make it difficult for pet owners to pinpoint their pet's exact location in some situations.
2. Visibility: Since collar-mounted trackers are external devices, they can be easily spotted by others, including potential thieves who may target pets with these devices. This can put the pet at risk of being stolen or harmed.
3. Comfort: Some pets may find collar-mounted trackers uncomfortable or irritating, especially if the device is large or heavy. This can lead to the pet trying to remove the collar or tracker, potentially compromising the device's effectiveness.
4. Durability: Collar-mounted pet trackers can be prone to damage from wear and tear, weather, or accidents. This can reduce the device's effectiveness and may require pet owners to replace the tracker more frequently.
Implantable Pet Trackers
Implantable pet trackers, also known as microchips, are small devices that are inserted under the pet's skin by a veterinarian. These trackers use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to store a unique identification number that can be scanned by a compatible reader to retrieve the pet's information.
Advantages:
1. Durability: Implantable pet trackers are designed to last a lifetime, making them a more permanent solution for pet owners who want to ensure their pet's safety and security. These trackers are less likely to be damaged or lost compared to collar-mounted devices.
2. Undetectable: Since implantable trackers are inserted under the pet's skin, they are not visible to others, reducing the risk of theft or targeting by potential thieves.
3. Comfort: Implantable pet trackers are small and lightweight, making them comfortable for pets to wear. Pets are unlikely to notice the presence of the device, reducing the risk of irritation or discomfort.
4. Universal compatibility: Implantable pet trackers are compatible with a wide range of scanners, making it easier for shelters, veterinarians, and pet owners to access the pet's information if needed.
Disadvantages:
1. Invasive procedure: Implantable pet trackers require a minor surgical procedure to insert the device under the pet's skin. This can be a concern for pet owners who are hesitant to put their pet through an invasive procedure.
2. Limited tracking capabilities: Implantable pet trackers do not offer real-time tracking capabilities like collar-mounted devices. Instead, they provide a unique identification number that can be used to locate the pet's owner if the pet is found by someone else. This makes them less useful for pet owners who want to monitor their pet's movements in real-time.
3. Cost: Implantable pet trackers can be more expensive than collar-mounted devices, both in terms of the initial cost of the tracker and the cost of the veterinary procedure required to insert the device.
4. Battery life: While implantable trackers do not require battery replacements, they rely on a power source from the pet's body to function. Over time, this can cause the device to lose power and become less effective.
Conclusion
Both collar-mounted and implantable
Update Time:2025-05-16 00:28:13
Wearable Devices Daily rankings
Correction of product information
If you notice any omissions or errors in the product information on this page, please use the correction request form below.
Correction Request Form
